On 14-Nov-16 4:00 PM, Gary Lee wrote:
> I just moved  avnd_send_node_up_msg() outside the if block. The compsci
> and susi messages are sent in the same conditions as before?
But when that if condition will hit. After headless state when first 
controller comes up within MDS timer limit we Will get avd_up and we are 
sending only MDS_UP event (If condition is not hit). So now we will not 
get again node_up for same AVD? So how this AMFND will send sync 
information.

Thanks,
Praveen
>
> Quoting praveen malviya <praveen.malv...@oracle.com>:
>
>> But still when AMFND will send the sync information to AMFD with this
>> patch?
>> Those are generally the first messages and they are still in that if
>> block. Am I missing something?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Praveen
>>
>> On 14-Nov-16 2:26 PM, Gary Lee wrote:
>>> Hi Praveen
>>>
>>> I think it’s unlikely there is a set_leds in the queue. That would
>>> have been sent from the ‘old’ amfd, before the ‘new’ amfd sends
>>> node_up. So the set_leds would likely have been processed first.
>>>
>>> The patch is just making the behaviour the same as receiving NCSMDS_UP.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>> On 14 Nov. 2016, at 5:48 pm, praveen malviya
>>>> <praveen.malv...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Gary,
>>>>
>>>> The reason for asking: patch is sending NODE UP event without
>>>> sending sync information for COMPCSI and SUSI. AVD_UP event for both
>>>> adest and vdest comes almost simultaneously. So this function will
>>>> not get triggerd and this AMFND will remain never be able to sync
>>>> its compcsi and susi.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Praveen
>>>>
>>>> On 14-Nov-16 11:44 AM, Gary Lee wrote:
>>>>> Hi Praveen
>>>>>
>>>>> I don’t have traces - both that is a possibility. If it is in the
>>>>> mailbox, amfnd will still be stuck unless an amfd switchover occurs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14 Nov. 2016, at 4:35 pm, praveen malviya
>>>>>> <praveen.malv...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Gary,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One quick question: Is this that case when AMFD restarted before
>>>>>> sending set_led to AMFND? I just want to know Is there any
>>>>>> possibility that set_led message is present in AMFND mail box.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Praveen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11-Nov-16 11:16 AM, Gary Lee wrote:
>>>>>>> osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc |  5 ++---
>>>>>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if amfd restarts before set_leds is received by amfnd, then
>>>>>>> amfnd will not send node_up. amfnd should send node_up
>>>>>>> even if led state is not green.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc
>>>>>>> b/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc
>>>>>>> --- a/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc
>>>>>>> +++ b/osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc
>>>>>>> @@ -562,13 +562,12 @@ uint32_t avnd_evt_mds_avd_up_evh(AVND_CB
>>>>>>>          */
>>>>>>>         if (evt->info.mds.i_change == NCSMDS_NEW_ACTIVE &&
>>>>>>> cb->is_avd_down) {
>>>>>>>             if (cb->led_state == AVND_LED_STATE_GREEN) {
>>>>>>> -                LOG_NO("Sending node up due to NCSMDS_NEW_ACTIVE");
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>                 // node_up, sync sisu, compcsi info to AVND for
>>>>>>> recovery
>>>>>>>                 avnd_sync_sisu(cb);
>>>>>>>                 avnd_sync_csicomp(cb);
>>>>>>> -                avnd_send_node_up_msg();
>>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>> +            LOG_NO("Sending node up due to NCSMDS_NEW_ACTIVE");
>>>>>>> +            avnd_send_node_up_msg();
>>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>>         cb->is_avd_down = false;
>>>>>>>     }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to