Why?
I mean why would it be more difficult to do the same thing in obe CCB than
in several ?
Is there some implicit ordering necessary between the CSI set's.
In other words is there some dependency between the CSI sets, that
curently is validated by the AMF-OI ?
---
** [tickets:#750] AMF: creating multiple CSIs are rejected**
**Status:** accepted
**Milestone:** future
**Created:** Mon Jan 27, 2014 10:24 AM UTC by Hans Feldt
**Last Updated:** Wed Mar 26, 2014 11:59 AM UTC
**Owner:** Nagendra Kumar
AMF supports adding one CSI per CCB to an unlocked SI. This means if several
CSIs are to be added, many CCBs will be performed by SMF (from a campaign).
However since the first CSI create is still "pending" when the second CSI one
comes to AMF, the second one is can be rejected (by AMF). All depending in
timing.
One problem is that the OI completed callback does not give the OI any chance
to say TRYAGAIN. It is either accept or reject.
Adding a delay to the campaign between each CSI create is not a plausible
solution thus AMF needs to support this case.
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is
subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at
https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/admin/tickets/options. Or, if this is a
mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-tickets mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-tickets
