Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. Juni 2006 09:43 schrieb Bud P. Bruegger:
I've always wondered whether this violates the LGPL license of OpenSC
or not.
I don't think this is a problem (a card driver is or could be implemented
as a separate library)
...
also we have (or had?) that generic load external driver interface so opensc
it should still work (although I must admit I didn't test it for quite some
time)
was initially designed to allow binary only drivers. these days I think the
belpic way is better - copy opensc, rename opensc to foobar and add your
driver. open source everything except card-newdriver.c, but include the
*.o file (and specify which linux/compiler/... you used).
sorry but why is this approach better than supplying a binary driver ?
I think this is even worse as this will create unnecessary forks ...
Cheers,
Nils
_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
