On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:57:34 +0100 Viktor TARASOV <viktor.tara...@opentrust.com> wrote:
> > Another possible, 'alternative to alternative' scheme is to use C_SetPin() > in the specific context (after C_Login(CKU_SPECIFIC_CONTEXT)). > > So, in CKU_USER_PIN context C_SetPin() is used to change user PIN, > in CKU_CONTEXT_SPECIFIC it's used to unblock user PIN. > > Afais, CKU_CONTEXT_SPECIFIC is not actually used. > The problem here is that this is not something that's specified in the standard, and it's not the system existing implementations use. I think that as far as the interface goes, C_Login(CKU_SO) followed by C_InitPin() is set in stone as we want to be compatible with what's already out there. Rgds -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel