Martin Paljak wrote: > On Feb 1, 2010, at 17:07 , Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > >> Am Montag 01 Februar 2010 15:10:05 schrieb Viktor TARASOV: >> >>> Sure, one can tell that card specific part can access the sc_pkcs15_card >>> through the profile->p15_spec, >>> but, imho, direct manner looks better. >>> >> fine with me. >> >> btw: if you need to touch pkcs11/ for that, maybe you know the >> code best: IIRC there are several frameworks (so that in theory >> we could implement alternatives to pkcs#15). maybe that option >> is no longer interesting and can go. but I'm no expert on that, >> it seems so far we have a "pkcs15" and a "pkcs15init" implementation >> of that framework structure, so no idea if we can simplify the >> code there or not. >> > > In real life the two frameworks are deeply interconnected and interdependent > for now. >
Do you mean two frameworks in pkcs11: 'framework-pkcs15' and 'framework-pkcs15init' ? Do we really use the second one? > It looks like a logical move to me. > > -- Viktor Tarasov <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
