Am Dienstag 02 Februar 2010 12:50:29 schrieb Martin Paljak: > Two separate frameworks in the pkcs#11 module, as they exist now, don't > make sense (separate pkcs15init and pkcs15)
so what do we need to do to clean this up and keep only the used code? > the same way separated pkcs15init library did not do any good. happy with the changes so far (result: one dll), or do you want further changes (e.g. move source to libopensc/ directory)? > At the same time having a > pluggable codebase in the PKCS#11 module would be beneficial, for example > to be able to easily create a PKCS#11 module for a card that does not > implement a filesystem and where emulating it in a card driver would not > make sense either. well, openpgp card is such a simple card, as far as I know. but still it uses the emulation. what are the chances someone will come up with such a card, after we haven't seen one in years. if we need to keep a little code for flexibility, that might be used in the future: fine with me. but if it is a lot of code or extra complexity, I think it would be best to get rid of it. Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
