On 2010-07-18 13:34, Anders Rundgren wrote: > On 2010-07-18 18:49, Stef Walter wrote: > >> >> The missing piece is a common standard for specifying which PKCS#11 >> modules for an application to load. > > This is not what Microsoft and Apple offers. > > They offer a directory of providers. If apps want to > discriminate against certain providers they can do that > based on provider name, capabilities, or through user selection. > If there is a need for local provider config, it is a part of the > application. > > I don't say that what you asking for is wrong, but it seems > that you want to architect it in another way than MSFT > and APPL did.
Yes that's correct. We're architecting it in a more flexible way, one that allows diversity of crypto libraries and can be adapted to varying security needs. Cheers, Stef _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
