On 07/18/2010 07:09 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote:
> On 2010-07-18 15:46, Stef Walter wrote:
>
>   
>> I'm thinking of using PAM for ideas. If you're familiar with PAM the
>> following will make sense:
>>
>>  * Directory of configuration files one per application.
>>  * Each file specifies modules to load.
>>  * Default configuration file when an application doesn't have its own.
>>  * Optional string to pass in as C_Initialize's pReserved so we
>>    can modules like NSS.
>>
>> I will ask around elsewhere besides OpenSC though. It's hard to believe
>> I'm the first one who has run into this need.
>>     
> I'm not familiar with PAM but with other applications using
> PKCS #11 like browsers, e-mail and CAs.
>
> I think it would be a major achievement makimg PKCS #11
> providers discoverable.  As it is now each application
> must either be manually configured or the provider installation
> is mucking around in the applications' config files.
>   

There was an attempt to define this. Early PKCS #11 working groups came
up with some unofficial guidelines. The current NSS system (where they
are stored in pkcs11.txt) was an attempt to implement that unofficial
guideline.

I wrote up the design a couple of times an kind of pushed it up for
comment in the cryptoki mailing list, but have not really gotten much
traction (partitially because I haven't had time to really push it).

bob
> anders
> _______________________________________________
> opensc-devel mailing list
> opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
> http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
>   


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Reply via email to