Le 24/03/2011 22:40, Emanuele Pucciarelli a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 15:50, Martin Paljak<mar...@martinpaljak.net> wrote: > >>> Has there been any progress or even some results on the discussion about >>> SM in OpenSC? >> >> Here's just a skeleton, add links and thoughts if you can: >> >> http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/SecureMessaging > I've updated the page with my proposed architecture. I believe that > it's a bit too abstract to see immediately whether it makes sense, but > I've thrown it away and redone a few times, because I'm trying to code > it in the meantime and I've already expunged the bits that made the > least sense. ;) If everything goes all right, I should have working > code in 2-3 weeks.
It seems that it goes slightly beyond our actual goal to have the less intrusive SM implementation. I do not follow everything in your proposal. Probably it would be more comprehensive to look onto the working maquette. > ANY and ALL suggestions, objections, sharp criticism, rotten eggs are > more than welcome from everyone, of course! :) > > Thanks, > -- Viktor Tarasov <viktor.tara...@opentrust.com> _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
