On 05/04/2011 20:58, Frank Morgner wrote: > My previous remarks in this mail apply to the inner structure of the SM > module. I consider your layout as the most promising. (Maybe because I > implemented something similar ;-) ) Beyond that what I have already said > about where to trigger SM, I have some other questions: Excuse me if I pop-in, but ... what about ISO/OSI stacking? I'm not an expert, but for what I understand you're "mixing" different layers. IIUC, SM should be an higher layer than APDU. Maybe a "virtual" UnsecureMessaging layer, peer of SM, could be useful for abstraction...
Or, maybe, I completely misunderstood the whole thing... :) Just my .02 . BYtE, Diego. _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
