Il 19/08/2012 15:50, Anders Rundgren ha scritto:

> Everything you write is fine and probably correct as well.
> The only "fly in the soup" is that *it is not happening*.
I think it will be just like the TPM: when enough people will realize
what it is, it won't get accepted by the public.
It's not long since "restricted boot" 'failed' and memory isn't so short.

> The smart card community has failed creating a cheap a readily
> available token that can be provisioned on-line while for example
> iPhone and Android already ships with built-in enrollment software.
It's still WIP: look at OpenKMS...

> However, there will always be a small market that prefers something
> special.
That's for sure :)

> I'm rather talking about the 99.999% that believes cost and availability
> matter.  I also think that the poor GUI support offered by smart cards
> will make these look quite dated compared to virtual smart cards having
> cool logotypes and stuff.
SCs *are really* dated as concept. Old, messy interface, conflicting
high-level "standards" (so many that everybody uses his own)...
That's why a token or even a small "calculator format" w/ USB
connectivity (and a standardized 'KISS' interface over the USB bus)
would be better.
Such a device could easily cost less than $100 (you can already find
Android tablets w/ 7" display and cap ts at about $65, with wifi or even
GSM connectivity! -- probably the only really needed piece of software
needed could be a driver to use the SIM reader as a CAD, plus some "glue").

BYtE,
 Diego.

_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Reply via email to