Hi Allen,
Allen Bierbaum wrote:
> I am sure this will be controversial, but what do people think about
> making OpenGL 2.0 a requirement for OpenSG 2.0? This would allow the
> code to rely upon having the real methods defined instead of looking up
> everything by extension and it would give OpenSG 2.0 a solid set of
> expectations about what is supported by the OpenGL implementation being
> used. Hopefully this would simplify some code and allow dropping
> support for older methods of doing things in OpenGL.
That won't work on Windows, as the Windows OpenGL headers are fixed at
1.something and won't change. I don't really want to ship our own OpenGL
headers, having all the constants defined is bad enough already.
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Opensg-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
