Dirk Reiners wrote: > Hi Allen, > > Allen Bierbaum wrote: >>>>> I have a pretty simple (and possibly naive) suggestion here. >>>>> >>>>> 1. We make a webpage for each release/iteration (maybe the roadmap page) >>>>> 2. We make a list of things we know we want to go in and things we would >>>>> like to see worked on (Dirk and other leaders start the page and others >>>>> contribute to it) >>>>> 3. We prioritize the list a bit and turn the tasks into tickets >>>>> 4. People pick the tickets they are willing/able to work on and put >>>>> their names with them. If they can, they try to give a time estimate, >>>>> something like "done before the end of October" or something else simple. >>>>> 5. When a task is done, cross it off the list. When the tasks are all >>>>> done the iteration is ready to go.
Does this mean you want to use this workflow? If so, could we start to document this (and other development process issues) in a developer guidelines document or something like that on the wiki. Other things we could put here are how to get commit access, how decisions are made, how to submit patches, coding standard, how version numbering works, and all the other development process type information. I don't have much time this week to work on a page like this, but if someone starts it I will do my best to contribute to it next week. -Allen > > I started a roadmap page for 2 at > http://opensg.vrsource.org/trac/wiki/Planning2_0 . > Comments requested! > > I'm unsure about the value of having an explicit list of tickets on the > page (like the current 1.8). The roadmap provides a list of open > tickets, and I would just put a similar link on the page. I added the > list of open tickets to the page just for fun, but right now it's a > little long... ;) > > So essentially after 3. the planning page would be empty and could be > removed (unlinked). 4. can be done by reassigning in the ticket. I added > an 'Estimated Time of Completion' field to the ticket system, we can use > that for the time. Preferred format is yyyy/mm/dd, but it's just free > text for any kind of estimation. > >> I still don't know how to fully add a new fc or how to extend the system >> to rendering a new node core, so I think I am still an outsider. > > But you can make it work if you need to, so that doesn't count. ;) > >> Maybe I >> am just a slightly more involved (ie. louder) outsider. :) > > I can certainly hear you more often than most other people. :) > > Dirk > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Opensg-core mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Opensg-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
