Hi,
Allen Bierbaum wrote:
> Dirk Reiners wrote:
>> Carsten Neumann wrote:
>>> I'd appreciate it if you could try this out and give me some feedback on
>>> your experience (I might have accidentally killed your favorite feature
>>> ;) ).
>> in general I like it, it seems cleaner than before. The only thing I'm not
>> too
>> happy about is the need to have an SConscript in each directory, but for now
>> let's keep it that way.
>
> That does sounds like a step back. What is the reason for doing it this
> way as opposed to build.info files or even SConscript files only being
> in the "parent" directories for libraries?
it is far simpler to implement and IMHO understand. I've just added a
warning that complains about directories without SConscript file, this
should avoid confusion when new directories are added to the tree. I
could even turn this into an error, to make it harder to miss ?
Thanks,
Carsten
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Opensg-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
