SF with Trac would be a good combo. We have been moving most of our OSS projects over to google code because we find it more reliable and a bit less annoying then SF, but that is just one opinion. With GV's use of GIT, it may be interesting to evaluate gitorious or github in combination with SF/Trac. Hg is also an option if you use Google code. So many choices. :)
-Allen On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Dirk Reiners<[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Everybody, > > in preparation for the 2.0 launch we've been looking into moving back to SF. > They have SVN and Trac support, which were the main problems and reasons why > we > moved away. EWxcept for that SF has always had (IMHO) very good reliability > and > support, so I don't see why we shouldn't move back. > > Is there anything I'm missing here? Can anybody think of a good reason not to > do it? > > Thanks > > Dirk > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Opensg-core mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Opensg-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
