Hi, On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 15:10 +0800, Gerrit Voß wrote: > Hi, > > Am Feb 25, 2011 um 1:40 PM schrieb Dirk Reiners <[email protected]>: > > > > The question now is do we want to use the default repo > > (opensg.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/opensg/opensg) or the OpenSG 2 repo > > (opensg.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/opensg/opensg_2)? > > > > I would prefer the default, as that is the one that is listed on the SF > > code > > access page. The page also says that there might be other repos, but I'm > > sceptical about people reading that... If 1 should move to git I would > > probably > > create an opensg_1 repo > > agree, so lets go with gitroot/opensg/opensg this way we can push 2 to > opensg_2 > if we live to see the day that works starts on 3 ;)
as I saw the repo is there I will push OpenSG 2 to opensg.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/opensg/opensg or are there any objections ? kind regards gerrit ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Opensg-core mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
