Hi Gerrit,
On 02/22/2011 07:52 PM, Gerrit Voß wrote:
>
> hmm, while I like git for my local work I still would prefer a central
> repository that ensures
> a linear history where the history can not be changed easily. I still run
> this combination
> locally for repositories where groups of people can commit to.
given that you're the one with the most GIT experience (well, definitely more
than me) I'll defer to your judgment.
> I feel that one has to change the workflow when transitioning to git and adapt
> to the multi-repository model with a very limited set of comitters for a
> single repository
> and pulls between repositories or patches per mail as the norm.
I'm all for it. That's what I was thinking for SF with you, me and Carsten for
OpenSG2 and Johannes, Patrick and somebody else from Darmstadt for 1.
> Just replacing svn by git and go on like before does not seem to be the best
> approach to me.
> IMHO we need to put in a little more thinking about how we want to have the
> workflow
> before switching to git.
Ok, let's talk about it.
I would like to use git as it makes submitting patches very easy and through
github almost automated. I'm also thinking about moving more docs into the
repo,
which would benefit from easy additions/patches (more about that later). It
would probably also help the 1.x faction to coordinate their stuff more
flexibly.
Comments?
Dirk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in
Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data
generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual
or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business
insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Opensg-core mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-core
