Hi Marcus, I agree. I think that my "almost impossibile" was a bit too strong. I just wanted to say that distributing scripting code (and I was thinking mainly to shaders) might be simpler than distributing native dlls, expecially if you have heterogeneous master-slaves.
Franco -----Messaggio originale----- Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Marcus Lindblom Inviato: 16 May 2007 15:45 A: [email protected] Oggetto: Re: [Opensg-users] R: About OpenSG clustering Franco Tecchia wrote: > Also, > distributing CPU code can be almost impossible on a C++ framework (but you > might consider using a Virtual Machine and some scripting language). > This is of some interest to me. I would be thinking that you could always send shared_library files and load them dynamically (during runtime or as a part of the startup/init script, the latter is something OpenSG supports). It does require a framework which handles that, it's not _that_ difficult to do it yourself, IMHO. Of course, I could be missing something that applies more to clustering as opposed to generic plugin development? Cheers, /Marcus ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
