Dirk Reiners wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 10:29 -0500, Patrick Hartling wrote:
>
>>I am curious about which namespace is recommended for software using
>>OpenSG. I see that OSG is a preprocessor symbol that maps to osg, and
>>it has been suggested to me that code should be using OSG:: in case the
>>osg:: namespace should be renamed in the future. As far as I have seen,
>>the documentation doesn't touch on this topic, and all the tutorial code
>>I have seen uses USING_NAMESPACE_OSG. So, I guess the question becomes,
>>should code be using OSG::, osg::, or USING_NAMESPACE_OSG?
>
>
> USING_NAMESPACE_OSG is just a convenience for 'namespace OSG {} using
> namespace OSG;', so you're free to use it if you want, but you don't
> have to.
>
> In general I'd prefer using OSG:: instead of osg::, especially for
> extensions, for the reasons you cited.Okay, thanks for the clarification. I had been using osg::, but I'll switch it over to OSG::. -Patrick -- Patrick L. Hartling | VP Engineering, Infiscape Corp. PGP: http://tinyurl.com/2msw3 | http://www.infiscape.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
