Patrick Daehne wrote:
Hello,
it seems that this whole multi-indexing discussion is an ideological
discussion, because there are no real strong arguments for multi-indexing or
against multi-indexing. Therefore, to stop that fruitless diskussion, I would
like to ask the project leader to make a decision. Concluding, I just would
like to mention that
- we have a working multi-indexing implementation.
- it is no problem to convert a multi-indexed geometry to a
single-indexed-geometry, but the other way is quite expensive.
- it is quite easy to integrate the proposed changes into the multi-indexing
implementation.
Agreed. The patches I have right now do not use multi-index but I think
I can update them fairly easily to use multi-index if that is the
direction everyone decides upon. I just need to know which way to
implement it. I really never thought such a small change would spark
such a large discussion. :)
-Allen
Bye,
Patrick
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
