So I'd say I expect them to be functional, but I can't promise that
they're bug-free.
They're not even functional. :-/
Actually, they're horribly buggy and quite unusable. (Have tested
sphere<->cyl and box<->cyl. Converting my cylinders to AABB and testing
produces valid and reasonable results (although not very useful in the
application). So, I'm quite confident in my geo->cyl and cyl->geo
functions, but for cylindervolume-intersection tests, I get false
positives and false negatives all over the place.
Using OOBB's would be acceptable here for me, but they are not available.
I'll dig up some cyl<->sphere algorithm from the net and see how that
works out, otherwise I'll be forced to abandon the cylinder approach
altogether.
Best Regards
/Marcus
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
