Hi Marcus,
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 16:13 +0200, Marcus Lindblom wrote:
>
> Neat! Yes, the build func is used only to construct a volume from
> scratch (so I had to cut it loose from my code), so I was aware it would
> not fit straight away. I rather figured you'd might use it later on, or
> it would be useful for some other OpenSG user out there, someday.
It might, depending on how the rest of the volume stuff develops. I'll
keep it around anyway. ;)
> Well, what I really wanted is the ability to express all those types
> simple and efficiently. Having a single type and check their subtype
> dynamically (by isFinite(), etc) does not really fit the spirit of a
> statically typed language such as C++.
>
> I'd like to have the ability to build geometric algorithms on top of
> OpenSG, and a solid foundation of good classes is important. Whether
> that matches your vision is another thing I suppose. :) (WildMagic is
> _very_ nice in this area, but lacks in other places where instead OpenSG
> excels, hence we chose OpenSG :)
Hm, I hadn't looked into that before. I've known about his books of
course, but the code is new to me. His math part is pretty impressive,
and the list of features is pretty long, too. What is he missing that
you found in OpenSG? ;)
Yours
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
