Hi Andreas,
Andreas Zieringer wrote:
yeah right that's a bug. Is this really what we want? opaque[n] -> transparent[n] -> opaque[n+1] -> transparent[n+1] Or is it better to render something like this? opaque[n] -> opaque[n+1] -> transparent[m] -> transparent[m+1]
I would prefer the top one. That would give the app more freedom to mix transparent and non-transparent as needed. Simulating the bottom one by just using a large offset for transparent keys is easy, the other way round is not.
My $.02 Dirk ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
