Hi Dirk,
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Zieringer wrote:
yeah right that's a bug.
Is this really what we want?
opaque[n] -> transparent[n] -> opaque[n+1] ->
transparent[n+1]
Or is it better to render something like this?
opaque[n] -> opaque[n+1] -> transparent[m] -> transparent[m+1]
I would prefer the top one. That would give the app more freedom to mix
transparent and non-transparent as needed. Simulating the bottom one by
just using a large offset for transparent keys is easy, the other way
round is not.
My $.02
yes good point I added the top one.
Andreas
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
