Hi Allen,
Allen Bierbaum wrote:
> I see what Dirk is saying about how the tests show up next to the code
> they are testing, but I really don't like that much because it makes the
> test mixin with the "normal" code. I would rather something like
> "testNode.cpp" or "test_Node.cpp" anything that would separate the tests
> from the standard code in the listings. :(
I actually like it being close, as that makes tests really visible and
obvious and avoid people missing tests. Given that the naming scheme is
clear (*Test.cpp is a test) I don't see why you would want to separate them.
You can still separate them if you want to for things that are not
clearly related to a certain OpenSG class (like
transformAndLODTest.cpp), but in general I like the close proximity for
now. I think its important to remind people of tests, to encourgae
writing them, and this is an easy way to do it.
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
