Hi, On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 22:02 -0500, Dirk Reiners wrote: > Hi Allen, > > Allen Bierbaum wrote: > > I see what Dirk is saying about how the tests show up next to the code > > they are testing, but I really don't like that much because it makes the > > test mixin with the "normal" code. I would rather something like > > "testNode.cpp" or "test_Node.cpp" anything that would separate the tests > > from the standard code in the listings. :( > > I actually like it being close, as that makes tests really visible and > obvious and avoid people missing tests. Given that the naming scheme is > clear (*Test.cpp is a test) I don't see why you would want to separate them. > > You can still separate them if you want to for things that are not > clearly related to a certain OpenSG class (like > transformAndLODTest.cpp), but in general I like the close proximity for > now. I think its important to remind people of tests, to encourgae > writing them, and this is an easy way to do it.
Actually I have no preference, I was just curious what broke the configure system and which of the two should be changed ;-) So the answer is the configure system ;-) regards, gerrit ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
