Hi, On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 19:10 -0500, Dirk Reiners wrote: > Hi Marcus, > > Marcus Lindblom wrote: > >
> That's the way 2 is anyway, to reflect the installation structure already > during > build. Given that you get a direectory with lots of files it might not have a > positive impact on performance, but the compile lines sure looks nicer. ;) but is has some not so nice drawbacks. One thing the build tools are not capable of keeping this dir really up-to-date. Especially if you move or delete files you better not forget to delete the whole include dir. Second, the debugger references the installed include files not the source files. This can be quite annoying as you change things and the rebuild did not catch everything or worse overwrote your changes ;-(. So I'm not a 100% convinced that this is mature enough to be used seriously. gerrit ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
