Gerrit Voss wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 11:08 +0200, Andreas Zieringer wrote: > >> couldn't reproduce this I get the following output with your test program: >> >> CPU cycles with manual inlining: 758135486 >> CPU cycles With Pointinterface: 811406783 >> Ratio: 1.07027 > > Just a quick update, I ran some more test, same compiler options, > VS2005:
[snip] > So more templates are better, I knew it ;-). Ok, I guess we have to do > some more tests and have a closer look ;-) May I mention that the quest for performance is a bit at odds with usability? For instance, if you want peak performance, you should not have zero-initializing default ctors for vec/pnt classses. Cheres /Marcus ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
