Hi Mathias,
Mathias Gumz wrote:
>
> my normal display resolution here is around 1900 * 1200 pixel. which
> means that if your 8.5 million pixels only 1/4th get rendered in the
> final image, and only if each vector is represented by a single
> colored pixel.
Good point.
> which means: to get really great fps one should think about a
> different way to render those 8.5mio vectors to the screen, eg. to
> render only a subset (LODs comes to mind, carmack's megatexture
> approach is interesting as well)
LODs need some structure to it, so I'm not sure that he can create them easily.
Ronan, do you have an example image of what your data will look like?
> if all the vectors getting to the render-tree then having more
> overhead (more scenegraph nodes) basically just is .. overhead :)
:)
> yep, thats the question. if one looks onto the whole bunch from a
> certain distance it might be clever to combine several vectors to one
> and just render less geometry.
Doing that efficiently for a vector soup is not trivial, though.
> if one gets closer some of the vectors
> might just be outside of the current view frustrum and get culled
> away.
Yours
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
