Hi Marcus,
Marcus Lindblom wrote:
>> I agree it is useful to have both configurations, but I think our naming
>> here is quite confusing. My impression is that windows developers expect
>> DEBUG to be linked against the debug runtime.
>> I'd like to change DEBUG to mean that and have DEBUG_RRT (release run
>> time - better name?) for what we currently call DEBUG.
>
> RELEASE_NOOPT ?
That sort of hides the fact that it is designed for debugging... :-/
What about DEBUG_RELRUNTIME or DEBUG_RELEASE_RUNTIME? RRT is a little unclear.
Yours
Dirk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
