Hi Johannes,
Johannes Brunen wrote:
> What happens to 'osg' files written with OpenSG 1.8 and later on reading
> them back with OpenSG 2.0 with regard to the TextureChunk objects burried in
> the model?
>
> I thougth that the 'osg' file format is stable. Isn't it?
>
Ups. Nope, it is certainly not. OSG in fact is the most unstable of all
formats, as it is a direct mapping to the internal data structures, and
doesn't make any attenmpt at backwards compatibility.
OSB is much better, it has infrastructure for converting from older
versions (to some extend).
> Are there other classes I can't expect to be usable in the transition.
>
Probably. We need to work on the transition guide...
Dirk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
