Hello Gerrit,

"Gerrit Voß" <vo...@vossg.org> schrieb im 
Newsbeitrag
> On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 08:37 +0200, Johannes Brunen wrote:

>>
>>     Debug -> /MDd /Od as usually found on windows: suffix 'D'
>>     DebugOpt -> /MDd /O2 /Ob2 this one is perfect for application
>> development with consistent debug runtime. Used for debugging of the host
>> application, not of OpenSG: suffix 'OD'
>>     Release -> /MD /O2 /Ob2 the usual release target: no suffix
>
> that scheme misses the only one I really use, the one that is currently
> called Debug. As this is the only one I care about it can not go away.
>
Sorry, I did not mean that only these three targets should be provided. I 
solely meant that these three are the ones that I did use until now. So I 
would like to request the currently unsupported target

DebugOpt  -> /MDd /O2 /Ob2 with a different suffix

> How it is named, I don't really care, the current names come from the
> original scons implementation. We can rename DebugRT to DebugRRT
> an switch it with Debug, but than I would change DebugOpt to DebugDRT.
>
I do care in the sense that I would like to have a little consitency in the 
zoo of libraries I have to handle. For instance I'm used to copy the dynamic 
link libraries all into one path. So I do not have to change my environment 
if I switch between debug and release libraries. Therefore it is important 
that the libraries do carry different names. Of course, that is not the only 
feasable way of working, but it is my habit and I would like to stick at it.

Last, the targets should be named in a way that the user can conclude the 
runtime, optimization level and debug info from the name.

>
>> Maybe it is possible to give the user a customization point at hand, so 
>> that
>> he can take responsibility of the actually naming scheme.
>
> hmm, there is a lot of cmake magic involved in getting this right on
> windows, so I'm not a 100% if one can strip it down enough.
>
dito

>> Another question. Is the documentation going to be build also from the 
>> cmake
>> generated platform project files?
>
> should, my solution has a Doc target but I never tried it. At least
> 'make Doc' works.
>
Ok, I will try it...

Best,
Johannes





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
Opensg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users

Reply via email to