Hello Gerrit, "Gerrit Voß" <vo...@vossg.org> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:1245983834.3311.65.ca...@feynman.camtech.ntu.edu.sg...
> > As I said I really don't have a preference as long as it is consistent > in some form. So your solution would be: > > Debug -> (short for DebugNoOpt) debug runtimr + no opt compiler > DebugOpt -> debug runtime + opt compiler > ReleaseNoOpt -> release runtime + no opt compiler > Release -> (short for ReleaseOpt) release runtime + opt compiler > > with the suffices: > > Debug -> D (short for DN) > DebugOpt -> DO > ReleaseNoOpt -> RN > Release -> again don't need one. > > As you and Johannes are the most vocal on this, I would be glad if > both of you agree on the variant both of you are happy with. > I'm fine with this variant. IMHO it is an imporvement over the current scheme. Thank you all for your patience. Best Johannes
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list Opensg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
