Hi, On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 13:37 +0800, Gerrit Voß wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 10:58 +0200, Andreas Halm wrote: > > Hi Gerrit, > > > > > are you going to store MFC based elements in FieldContainers or just > > > call into MFC ? > > > > I havn't really thought about storing MFC based classes in FieldContainers, > > and it wouldn't work that well anyway. > > > > Currently I have a nodecore based class which is specific to one > > application, and I want to compile and link it together with an MFC > > application. I am using it to display some data as part of the scene graph. > > Of course it would also be possible to put it into a library for which I > > would have to disable precompiled headers, and link it to the rest of the > > application. It is maybe more a question of convenience. > > ok, hmm just cuirious but than how does MFC dependent code end up being > seen in OpenSG generated files ?. If you don't store anything only the > cpp file accessing it should see the MFC parts and that should be under > your control. > > The most general solution would probably be to change OSGConfig.h though > that might double the prebuild packages for windows. So for now I'm > going to add another set of optional includes to fcd2code. >
ok, its in, you now can specify additionalPriorityIncludes for the field container which will be included before anything else in the cpp file. kind regards, gerrit ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
