On 2010-01-12 20:40, Dominik Rau wrote: > Hi. > > Am 12.01.2010 15:17, schrieb Marcus Lindblom:
> > In my opinion, getting the web sites back online / getting rid of the > old ones and providing 2.0 daily builds, at least for Windows is > extremely important and I'd be happy to help with "man hours" and/or > material. However, if there already is some infrastructure (AFAIR for > 1.x there were several build bot machines), it would be pointless to do > all the work again. On the core-list, there are fixes underway. The computer running opensg.org was located (very dusty, noisy fan, won't survive reboot) and things are being moved to fresh hardware. So I think we're heading in the right direction. :) However, I'd love to see github.com being used instead of SVN, as it's much easier to maintain own changes, submit fixes for bugs and for core-devs to pull & integrate patches. Also, a separate "core" list seems slightly unnecessary, but nevermind. (I took the liberty to subscribe the core-list to gmane.org, btw.) Cheers, /Marcus ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list Opensg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
