Hi. Am 13.01.2010 17:16, schrieb Marcus Lindblom: >> - CPack. If anybody knows CPack enough to set it up, please take a look at >> our >> CMake system and see if you can add CPack support. Our CMake is not trivial, >> due >> to the many libraries and dependencies and example programs, and we >> definitely >> need support for Linux, Windows and OSX, so a quick and dirty hack won't cut >> it. >> > This is not as important for us, as we always build my own OpenSG (to > match our boost/qt/vtk builds). > > It might be for one-off projects etc etc, but for real long-lived > projects, you need more control over build-options. >
Agreed. But it makes it way easier for new users (students (that might become professional users in the long run), companies that want to evaluate etc...) to download a ready to use package (msi, deb, dmg) and "just use it" than ask them to build the beast themselves. The intention behind this clearly is to attract more users to OpenSG and get rid of the first hurdle. For that reason, I think it's also perfectly fine to go just with the "main stream" here, so 32Bit Windows, Ubuntu and Mac should be perfectly fine. If you want to use OpenSG on 64Bit Solaris with the latest boost repository version, you're on your own. More advanced users can stand that. Yours, Dominik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list Opensg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
