Hi, On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 13:31 +0100, Johannes Brunen wrote: > Hello Gerrit, > > "Gerrit Vo" <vo...@vossg.org> schrieb im > Newsbeitrag news:1300969044.2866.70.ca...@feynman.camtech.ntu.edu.sg... > > > > hmm, but would that not do the wrong thing ?. The aim of the loop > > is to detect if the geometry had already been striped before and if this > > is the case not to run the striper the geometry again (unless forces) > > > ok, I did assume that it should detect if unstriped primitives are present. > > > > So the original loop does that, if it detects a strip inside the types > > it concludes that the striper had already been run earlier and it does > > not stripe the geometry again. > > > > The striper does not guarantee a type field with only GL_TRIANGLE_STRIP > > entries. As you say GL_TRIANGLE_FAN is possible but GL_TRIANGLES is as > > well. > > > > What was the problem with the original condition, was checking just for > > the first strip to optimistic ? > > > I think that this is to conservative. The geometry might be partely striped. > For instance the facetter I use does produce quads and quad stripes beside > of triangle stripes and fans.
a ok, so a better condition would be to check for non triangular primitives ? kind regards gerrit ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list Opensg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
