Hello Michael,
On 05/11/2011 02:13 PM, Michael Raab wrote:
your idea is not completely clear to me.
What exactly are do you propose to write? An empty node with a
MeshCollection attachment?
yes.
Could you provide a fcd for MeshCollection as attachment?
either along the lines of the attached (which in a way rolls
MeshCollection and MeshDesc into one) or just derive your MeshCollection
from Attachment instead of Node. I haven't tested this specifically, but
I hope it illustrates the idea.
Cheers,
Carsten
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<FieldContainer
name="VDTMeshCollectionAttachment"
parent="Attachment"
library="Ext"
pointerfieldtypes="both"
structure="concrete"
systemcomponent="false"
parentsystemcomponent="true"
decoratable="false"
useLocalIncludes="false"
>
<Field
name="meshNames"
type="std::string"
cardinality="multi"
visibilty="external"
access="protected"
>
Mesh Identifiers.
</Field>
<Field
name="meshRoots"
type="NodePtr"
cardinality="multi"
visibility="external"
access="public"
>
Mesh Root Nodes.
</Field>
</FieldContainer>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
Opensg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
