Hi, On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 15:23 +0200, Christian Bar wrote: > Hello. > I'm writing to inform you about a criticality of OpenSG 2.0: importing 3D > models exported from CATIA v5 in VRML requires much more time than using > OpenSG 1.8. > > The problem is probably due to the particular structure of these VRMLs: the > node tree contains useless or redundant geometries (e.g. edges, borders) > and is composed by thousands of nodes and transformations. We know that > this structure is not optimal for 3d visualization with OpenSG, but with > these files OpenSG 1.8 preformances (especially loading time), anyway, were > much better than OpenSG 2.0... > > We really appreciate, if it is possible, if you could check why OpenSG 2.0 > has more problems than 1.8 in managing these type of VRMLs and try to > improve the performances in this sense... Thank you in any case. > If you need an example file, we could send it to you.
I'll look into it, an example file would be great. thanks gerrit ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list Opensg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
