I agree that we should support as many clients as possible, and its a good idea to have a couple in core, but I would be against having support for lots of clients directly in core. Most extra ones should go on forge etc.
--- On Mon, 23/2/09, Frisby, Adam <[email protected]> wrote: From: Frisby, Adam <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] MXPClient? To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Monday, 23 February, 2009, 4:16 AM I'm open to ideas on other clients we could implement too btw. Anything that has a well described protocol is up for grabs. Adam > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:opensim-dev- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Diva Canto > Sent: Sunday, 22 February 2009 7:55 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] MXPClient? > > Frisby, Adam wrote: > > Melanie can probably elucidate a little as to why it's good for us to > have a couple of IClientAPI's in core - namely that it helps prevent > monoculture in naming schemas and flow. > > > +100 just for this. > > _______________________________________________ > Opensim-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev _______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
_______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
