Just as a completely theoretical question, how much work do you think would be involved in pulling all LLUDP and Linden viewer-specific code out of OpenSim and putting it in a module? It would be interesting to see an MXP-only OpenSim.
John >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:opensim-dev- >[email protected]] On Behalf Of MW >Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 2:26 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] MXPClient? > >I agree that we should support as many clients as possible, and its a >good idea to have a couple in core, but I would be against having >support for lots of clients directly in core. Most extra ones should go >on forge etc. > >--- On Mon, 23/2/09, Frisby, Adam <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: Frisby, Adam <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] MXPClient? > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, 23 February, 2009, 4:16 AM > > > I'm open to ideas on other clients we could implement too btw. > > Anything that has a well described protocol is up for grabs. > > Adam > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:opensim-dev- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Diva Canto > > Sent: Sunday, 22 February 2009 7:55 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] MXPClient? > > > > Frisby, Adam wrote: > > > Melanie can probably elucidate a little as to why it's good >for > us to > > have a couple of IClientAPI's in core - namely that it helps >prevent > > monoculture in naming schemas and flow. > > > > > +100 just for this. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensim-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev > _______________________________________________ > Opensim-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev > > _______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
