I think the proposal is exactly the opposite, at least for the time
being. That is, let's use whatever the LL viewer already has for 3D
rendering, and let's move the non-3D features out onto Web applications.
Gustavo Alberto Navarro Bilbao wrote:
If that is the proposal, +1 from me too. to can choose a rendering
engine like OGRE/COLLADA allow a significant improvement in the
client.
2009/2/24 Impalah <[email protected]>:
I think I didn't understand the proposal... or maybe yes.
You are proposing to separate 3D rendering code from 2D (windows and so on)
on the viewer to allow them to choose what rendering engine to use? +1 from
my part
2009/2/24 Tommi Laukkanen <[email protected]>
+1 from me too. The 2d ui can start as sub set of html for example.
_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
