There's also a very nice paper about it here.
http://srl.cs.jhu.edu/pubs/SRL2003-02.pdf

Tommi Laukkanen wrote:
Thanks :) I stand corrected

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Diva Canto <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Just to keep the record straight, the Capabilities concept is
    about 50 years old. It was devised at about the same time as ACLs.
    For a number of reasons, ACLs have dominated the field. See here
    for a nice historical perspective:
    
http://www.nabble.com/On-the-Spread-of-the-Capability-Approach-to5608409.html

    Tommi Laukkanen wrote:
    Hi Diva
Thanks for the analysis. I have to admit I have only fastly
    scanned the oAuth spec. They advertise that it works for desktop
    applications so I assume it should not necessarily be too complex
    for the end user and not too hard to implement either. Someone
    would need to study / poc it or get a statement from the oAuth
    team. If the viewer acts as users and regions are consumers it
    could be that it can be nicely automated and hidden from the
    user. This would allow us to use all those identity providers who
    have adopted oAuth. Personally I think identity management,
    authentication and authorisation are so well known fields that it
    would be odd if we had to invent it from scratch. That said we
    should not try bend a standard to something which is not suitable
    for.
In the end it is important to realise that this is not just about
    virtual worlds but all identity management in the net. No user
    wants to upkeep separate credentials just for virtual worlds.
    Besides web and vws will become more and more entangled in the
    long run. If we want to have a system which will fly in the near
    future we should stick our identity eggs to same basket with the
    rest of the internet crowd.
regards,
    Tommi
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    _______________________________________________ Opensim-dev
    mailing list [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev


    _______________________________________________
    Opensim-dev mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev

_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev

Reply via email to