Well, this may or may not be, Melanie. But, I would feel a whole lot more comfortable about the whole proposal *after* at least two different groups report success in configuring BUST and that it is not busted.
At that point, we need enough clear and concise documentation on the wiki to allow others running grids to be able to change. After a half dozen different grids have adopted the notion of BUST and determined it is not busted, then we could consider deprecating our existing UGAIM. Charles ________________________________ From: Melanie <mela...@t-data.com> To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2009 8:13:04 AM Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] Deprecate OpenSim.Grid.InventoryServer and OpenSim.Grid.AssetServer? B.U.S.T. is Basic Universal Server Technology. The prompt can be changed in the configuration file, though, for those without a sense of humor. I fully expect things to get renamed before 1.0. On the other hand, the server is named OpenSim.Server.exe, no body parts there! As soon as connectors are available for the other services, it will be able to run them. Part of this is getting the old servers out of the way, since the new servers use different web protocols and keeping compatibility with the old servers will not be possible. At this point, the presence of the old servers blocks evolution. Melanie Sean Dague wrote: > Melanie wrote: >> The CB version we have in trunk is another implementation of similar >> concepts. It has some hooks for some features, which were never >> implemented, that the new system doesn't have yet, but the modular >> system make them entirely possible. >> >> At this point, the CB in trunk is stagnant. It's a stripped down >> version that is already incompatible with upstream CB and >> essentially unmaintained. I doubt anyone uses it and would think it >> could also be dropped or moved. > > I'm definitely in favor of getting stuff out of trunk that we think > isn't getting used at all, eliminates confusion in the code. > > Can we come up with a name better than BUST though, as that doesn't > really mean anything to me? :) Unrelated question, is it possible to > run all the grid services (not just inv & asset) via that 1 process? > That would simplify things for smaller (< 50 region) grids that probably > put all those on the same machine anyway. > > -Sean > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Opensim-dev mailing list > Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev _______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
_______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
