Hi, MW wrote: > Well my vote is that the new protocol is documented before it goes into > trunk. There is no reason that the protocol can't be designed before it is > implemented.
The specification itself is a moving target that needs commnity input. > But anyway if its not documented then my vote would be -1 on it going into > trunk. Even if it was a optional extra, it would still lead to confusion and > disruption among other things. More disruptive things have been done to trun routinely. What happened to "trunk is upoosed to be broken"? This won't even break trunk. > Something as big as a new protocol does need some design rather than just > flying into implementing it and seeing how it turns out. I think that is precisely the wrong way. In my experience, drawing board work leads to overengineering. Melanie _______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
