Well, I for one hope you are wrong, and that the core dev’s never place any limit on the direction that OS can go. SL is OLD technology, there are many new ideas coming out everyday. One of the advantages of having an open source implimentataion is that if the implimentation is designed correctly it can be extended into directions that SL would never be able to follow - for example Hypergrid.
Frank On Nov 9, 2013, at 8:14 PM, Mircea Kitsune <mircea_the_kits...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I decided to google parts of my questions earlier. Although I hate asking > something publicly to later answer myself, I think I am a bit more clear > after the info I found as well as the replies here. > > First of all, something I forgot to clarify: I wouldn't expect or want > Opensim to be a perfect replication of the SL server. On the contrary... > Opensim has the ability to fix things Linden never will in their server > software and add new features, which it should totally use. But IMO only for > changes that are compatible with all viewers, and don't introduce new > protocols for all sorts of software, which was the concern some of my > questions started from. > > Part of that was clarified by this page: > http://opensimulator.org/wiki/Communication_Protocols It describes how > communication with viewers works, and how I assume it plans to stay. The > interface (which that page names "the Linden Lab viewer protocol") is one > thing I wondering about, and if it's a fixed interface that doesn't need to > be maintained for various viewers. Of course there's more than just the > protocol, such as being limited to the prim and avatar shapes viewers can > recognize. For this reason, I assume prim types like "cube", "sphere", > "torus" will have to stay hard coded in Opensim and follow what Linden has. > These sort of things are usually was I unclear about. > > I also found a pretty insightful article which deserves a read: > http://arianeb.wordpress.com/2010/04/25/why-open-sim-is-the-future-metaverse-and-why-it-is-not-the-present/ > It helps better understand Opensim's purpose as a system for 3D internet. It > adds sense as to why non-SL viewers might have an use too, although I stick > to my belief about them being unneeded and wasted energy to make (unless it's > to enable SL on another platform, like Lumiya for Android). > _______________________________________________ > Opensim-dev mailing list > Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
_______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
