It wasn't so much a suggestion that we should do another official release
(which I think we should) more a question of whether there is a procedure for
deciding when to do a release and which revision?
g.
On 12 Oct 2010, at 05:45, Varun Chandramohan wrote:
> I agree with Gareth, Just a suggestion, can we not release a beta2?
>
> Regards,
> varun
>
> On Monday, October 11, 2010 09:49:48 pm Gareth Lowe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> OpenSLP 2.0.0-beta1 is 2 years old now and has known problems and the
>> recommendation seems to be to use an up to date revision from the
>> development tree instead.
>>
>> So is this the official recommendation?
>>
>> are there any solid plans to release another official version?
>>
>> what kind of qualification is involved in releasing an official version?
>>
>> Just so I know how to treat OpenSLP in some of our software.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Gareth.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
>> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
>> Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
>> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openslp-devel mailing list
>> Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
Openslp-devel mailing list
Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel
