Thank you very much for doing the testing Ian. We'll ensure we only commit
code that passes valid URL schemes.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Norton [mailto:inor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 1:30 AM
> To: John Calcote
> Subject: Re: [Openslp-devel] proposed patch for OpenSLP
> 
> Running this up in the attached test program I've not been able to find
any
> addresses that are accepted.
> 
> According to the RFC, here are some valid addresses.
> 
> service:device-drivers:ftp://x3.bean.org/drivers/diskdrivers.drv
> service:device-drivers:http://www.bean.org/drivers/drivpak.drv
> 
> and the openslp docs
> 
> service:weather.nasa:wtp://weather.nasa.com:12000
> service:weather.nasa:swtp://weather.nasa.com:12001
> service:chat.superchat://chat.superchat.com
> 
> And going by how naming authority stuff goes. the following should be
valid
> too:
> 
> service:x-private.name.authority:protocol://address:8888
> service:x-my-fancy-service.norton.ian:http://this.is.my.server
> 
> Regards
> 
> Ian
> 
> On 19 December 2011 08:02, Ian Norton <inor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I might be reading this wrong (it is rather early here) but it looks
> > to me that this only permits the abstract part of the service type to
> > contain only one "." which doesn't fit my interpretation of the RFC.
> >
> > Possibly the first break should be a continue.
> >
> > Also, (and it's early, I might be mis-reading this) this permits a
> > service url of:
> >
> > service:x.:/x
> >
> > Ian
> >
> >
> > On 16 December 2011 16:51, John Calcote <john.calc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> The patch looks ok to me - would someone mind committing it for
> >> Michal and Tomas? I don't currently have a work area checked out
> >> (updating my linux machine).
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> John
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Tomas Cech [mailto:tc...@suse.de]
> >>> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 6:19 AM
> >>> To: john.calc...@gmail.com
> >>> Cc: openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> Subject: proposed patch for OpenSLP
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Michal Srb proposed feature request with patch implementing it
> >>>
> >>>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3454443&gro
> >>> up
> >>> _id=1730&atid=351730
> >>>
> >>> but didn't receive any response yet. Is it acceptable for OpenSLP?
> >>> Can someone review and apply?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance.
> >>>
> >>> Tomas Cech
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> --------- Learn Windows Azure Live!  Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft
> >> is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for
> >> developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and
> >> what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE
> online.
> >> Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openslp-devel mailing list
> >> Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Windows Azure Live!  Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011
Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for 
developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it 
provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online.  
Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure
_______________________________________________
Openslp-devel mailing list
Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel

Reply via email to