Thank you very much for doing the testing Ian. We'll ensure we only commit code that passes valid URL schemes.
John > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Norton [mailto:inor...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 1:30 AM > To: John Calcote > Subject: Re: [Openslp-devel] proposed patch for OpenSLP > > Running this up in the attached test program I've not been able to find any > addresses that are accepted. > > According to the RFC, here are some valid addresses. > > service:device-drivers:ftp://x3.bean.org/drivers/diskdrivers.drv > service:device-drivers:http://www.bean.org/drivers/drivpak.drv > > and the openslp docs > > service:weather.nasa:wtp://weather.nasa.com:12000 > service:weather.nasa:swtp://weather.nasa.com:12001 > service:chat.superchat://chat.superchat.com > > And going by how naming authority stuff goes. the following should be valid > too: > > service:x-private.name.authority:protocol://address:8888 > service:x-my-fancy-service.norton.ian:http://this.is.my.server > > Regards > > Ian > > On 19 December 2011 08:02, Ian Norton <inor...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I might be reading this wrong (it is rather early here) but it looks > > to me that this only permits the abstract part of the service type to > > contain only one "." which doesn't fit my interpretation of the RFC. > > > > Possibly the first break should be a continue. > > > > Also, (and it's early, I might be mis-reading this) this permits a > > service url of: > > > > service:x.:/x > > > > Ian > > > > > > On 16 December 2011 16:51, John Calcote <john.calc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The patch looks ok to me - would someone mind committing it for > >> Michal and Tomas? I don't currently have a work area checked out > >> (updating my linux machine). > >> > >> Thanks, > >> John > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Tomas Cech [mailto:tc...@suse.de] > >>> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 6:19 AM > >>> To: john.calc...@gmail.com > >>> Cc: openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> Subject: proposed patch for OpenSLP > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Michal Srb proposed feature request with patch implementing it > >>> > >>> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3454443&gro > >>> up > >>> _id=1730&atid=351730 > >>> > >>> but didn't receive any response yet. Is it acceptable for OpenSLP? > >>> Can someone review and apply? > >>> > >>> Thanks in advance. > >>> > >>> Tomas Cech > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> --------- Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft > >> is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for > >> developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and > >> what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE > online. > >> Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Openslp-devel mailing list > >> Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Windows Azure Live! Tuesday, Dec 13, 2011 Microsoft is holding a special Learn Windows Azure training event for developers. It will provide a great way to learn Windows Azure and what it provides. You can attend the event by watching it streamed LIVE online. Learn more at http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-windowsazure _______________________________________________ Openslp-devel mailing list Openslp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openslp-devel