Garrett D'Amore wrote: > My personal preference, for now, would be to deliver *both* 32- and > 64-bit versions of the applications for both SPARC and x86, but > deliver the 64-bit versions in a separate path (/usr/bin/sparcv9 and > /usr/bin/amd64 or somesuch), so that end users can just adjust their > $PATH appropriately if they know they need or want 64-bit capable > programs (I think for the vast majority of users, this will not be > necessary.) Or, we could do what all linux distributors do, and provide completely separate 32 and 64 bit products.
This could be a lot of pain, for little gain. - jek3
