Roland Mainz wrote:
> Joseph Kowalski wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry. I was supposed to contact you after the last PSARC meeting.
>>
>> There is no serious fast-track specification for this case. If we are
>> unable to proceed with out one. The project team needs to produce one.
>>
>> At a minimum, such a proposal needs a very clear list of the effected
>> utilities and the rationale for the list of effected utilities.
>>
>
> Does that mean I have to make an ARC case for _each_ _single_ _binariy_
> I make 64bit clean ?
>
Humm,....
Despite my earlier response (like 3 minutes ago), yea. Without the case
which defines the "rules", we need to see a case for "each grouping" of
_each_ _single_ _binary_ you are proposing to deliver as 64-bit
objects. After a fairly small number of these (3? 5? 10?), the
precedent will be established.
So, you have a couple of choices as how to proceed:
1) Create a case that established the precedent. (Such as CLIP.)
2) Keep creating fast-tracks until when taken together we have a
precedent.
- jek3
